Compact mode
Boeing 757-200 vs Comac C919
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Boeing 757-200Comac C919Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.Both*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Boeing 757-200Comac C919Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Both*Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Both*Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Boeing 757-200Comac C919Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Both*
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftBoeing 757-200- Last produced in 2004 but still widely used
Comac C919- First Chinese-made commercial jetliner
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftBoeing 757-200- The plane that refuses to retire
Comac C919- Proof that copying homework can sometimes work
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Boeing 757-200Comac C919Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Both*- Narrow BodySingle-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeBoeing 757-200- Commercial AirlinesBoeing 757-200 is primarily operated by Commercial Airlines. Aircraft optimized for commercial passenger operations, balancing capacity and efficiency Click to see all.
- Charter ServicesBoeing 757-200 is primarily operated by Charter Services.
Comac C919- Regional TravelersComac C919 is primarily operated by Regional Travelers. Aircraft suitable for frequent regional travel with enhanced comfort features Click to see all.
- Budget AirlinesComac C919 is primarily operated by Budget Airlines. Cost-effective aircraft choices for low-cost carriers, maximizing efficiency and capacity Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillBoeing 757-200- Medium-Haul RoutesBoeing 757-200 is primarily used for Medium-Haul Routes. Aircraft optimized for routes between major regional destinations Click to see all.
- TranscontinentalBoeing 757-200 is primarily used for Transcontinental. Aircraft designed for efficient continent-spanning flights Click to see all.
Comac C919- Domestic FlightsComac C919 is primarily used for Domestic Flights. Aircraft optimized for in-country commercial routes Click to see all.
- Short-Haul RoutesComac C919 is primarily used for Short-Haul Routes.
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftBoeing 757-200- VersatilityBoeing 757-200 is known for Versatility.
- ReliabilityBoeing 757-200 is known for Reliability.
Comac C919- Chinese Aviation InnovationComac C919 is known for Chinese Aviation Innovation.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftBoeing 757-200- Excellent Range
- Powerful EnginesAircraft equipped with high-thrust engines for superior performance
- Proven Track Record
Comac C919- Cost-Effective
- New Technology
- Simple MaintenanceAircraft designed for easy maintenance procedures
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftBoeing 757-200- Aging Fleet
- Higher Fuel Consumption
Comac C919- Limited Track Record
- Range Limitations
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyBoeing 757-200Comac C919Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresBoeing 757-200Comac C919
Alternatives to Boeing 757-200
Boeing 737-900ER
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 757-200
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 757-200
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 757-200
Airbus A320-100
Known for Reliability
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 757-200
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 757-200
Boeing 737-700
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 757-200
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 757-200
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 757-200
Boeing 737-800
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 757-200
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 757-200
🛡
is safer than Boeing 757-200
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 757-200
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 757-200
Airbus A318
Known for Smallest A320 Family Member
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 757-200
Boeing 767-300ER
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 757-200
👥
has more seats than Boeing 757-200
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 757-200
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 757-200
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 757-200
🛡
is safer than Boeing 757-200
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 757-200
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 757-200
Embraer E175
Known for Cabin Comfort,Fuel Efficiency
🛡
is safer than Boeing 757-200